Not All Cochrane Reviews Are Good Quality Systematic Reviews
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviews
BACKGROUND In contemporary medical research, randomised controlled trials are seen as the gold standard for establishing treatment effects where it is ethical and practical to conduct them. In palliative care such trials are often impractical, unethical, or extremely difficult, with multiple methodological problems. We review the utility of Cochrane reviews in informing palliative care practice...
متن کاملMethodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
STUDY QUESTION Are there differences in the methodological quality of Cochrane systematic reviews (CRs) and non-Cochrane systematic reviews (NCRs) of assisted reproductive technologies? SUMMARY ANSWER CRs on assisted reproduction are of higher methodological quality than similar reviews published in other journals. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The quality of systematic reviews varies. STUDY DESI...
متن کاملAll Reviews are Not Created Equal :
Online product review networks play an important role in Internet commerce by transmitting information that customers can use to evaluate products in digital marketplace. These networks frequently include an explicit social component allowing consumers to view both how community members have rated individual product reviews and the social status of individual reviewers. We extend this prior wor...
متن کاملNew and Updated Cochrane Systematic Reviews
Background. Trigger finger is characterized by sometimes painful snapping or locking when flexing the finger. Although trigger finger is frequently seen in clinical practice, no standard treatment protocol has been established as “best practice.” Objective. The aim of this study was to achieve consensus on a multidisciplinary treatment guideline for trigger finger. Design. A European Delphi con...
متن کاملNew and Updated Cochrane Systematic Reviews
Objectives: We investigated whether the number of work shifts separated by less than 11 hours (quick returns) at baseline (T1) could predict health problems in nurses at 1-year follow-up (T2). Methods: 1224 nurses responded to a questionnaire-based survey in 2009 (T1) and 2010 (T2). Crude and adjusted logistic regression analyses were completed to assess the association between annual number of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Value in Health
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1098-3015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.142